Higman--Thompson groups Fn all the way down

Abstract

We prove that for every n 2 the Higman--Thompson group Fn has a maximal subgroup of infinite index isomorphic to itself. In fact, we construct a chain of subgroups Fn=H0>H1>H2>·s, all isomorphic to Fn and with trivial intersection, such that for every i the only subgroups of Fn containing Hi are Hi,Hi-1,…,H0=Fn; in particular, each Hi+1 is maximal in Hi. We prove that for all n m 2, every closed maximal subgroup of Fm isomorphic to Fn arises from a homeomorphism between the n-ary and m-ary Cantor spaces given by a finite semi-synchronizing transducer--a variation of the synchronizing transducers of Bleak, Cameron, Maissel, Navas and Olukoya. We characterize the homeomorphisms of Cantor spaces conjugating Fn into Fm as the order-preserving or order-reversing rational homeomorphisms whose minimal transducer is semi-synchronizing. At the heart of the paper is a machinery bridging transducers and Stallings 2-cores of subgroups, which reduces the conjugation of finitely generated closed subgroups by such homeomorphisms to an algorithmic procedure. As applications, we prove that Jones' ternary oriented subgroup F3 F3 is isomorphic to F4, answering questions of Aiello, and that all known maximal subgroups of infinite index of Thompson's group F which act minimally on (0,1) are isomorphic to Higman--Thompson groups. That raises the problem of whether all maximal subgroups of infinite index of F which act minimally on (0,1) are isomorphic to Higman--Thompson groups. We briefly discuss related results regarding fast groups of homeomorphisms and maximal subgroups of Thompson groups.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…