An 18-year Fermi-LAT stacking limit on GeV γ-ray emission from particle-accelerating colliding-wind binaries

Abstract

The wind-collision regions of massive colliding-wind binaries (CWBs) accelerate relativistic particles, as shown by their non-thermal radio synchrotron and, in η Car, hard X-ray emission. Whether CWBs emit GeV γrays as a population is unknown: only η Car is unambiguously detected by the Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT). We analyze 17.8 yr of Fermi-LAT data above 1 GeV (where the sharp point-spread function controls plane confusion) at the 61 confirmed (list A) particle-accelerating CWBs (PACWBs) of De Becker & Raucq, using a two-dimensional (photon index × flux) likelihood scan against 200 control fields matched in latitude, local source density, and diffuse intensity. Removing systems whose lines of sight coincide with bright catalogue γ-ray sources leaves a clean, mutually isolated sample of 6, whose stack is consistent with the control-field null (p=0.83): no evidence for collective GeV emission. Retaining those systems instead yields a spurious 3.5σ excess from chance catalogue coincidences, a caveat for Galactic-plane stacking. The resulting 95% limit on the mean per-source flux, F(>1\,GeV)1.1×10-11~ph\,cm-2\,s-1 (Γ=2), implies a γ-ray production efficiency η=Lγ/L wind4×10-6\,(d/kpc)2, about two orders of magnitude below η Car at the sample's median distance. A representative single-zone model then bounds the electron acceleration efficiency in CWB wind-collision regions unless their magnetic field is comparable to or above the magnetic-photon equipartition value. Among the high-latitude systems accessible to a clean stack, η Car thus appears to be a singular object rather than the brightest member of an emerging population.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…