Covering Points with Rectangular Boundaries

Abstract

Geometric covering problems ask for a small family of geometric objects whose union covers a given point set. We study the more restrictive boundary covering variant, where every point must lie on the boundary of a chosen object. Motivated by the framework of Langerman and Morin\,[Discret.\ Comput.\ Geom., 2005] for hyperspheres, we initiate the study of boundary covering by axis-parallel rectangles. We first consider the discrete setting, where rectangles must be selected from a given family. We define \ (): given a point set \(P⊂eqR2\), a family \(R\) of axis-parallel rectangles, and an integer \(k\), decide whether \(P\) can be covered by the boundaries of at most \(k\) rectangles from \(R\). We prove that \ is \(W[1]\)-hard parameterized by \(k\). We then study the continuous variant, \ (), where rectangles may be placed freely. Given \(P⊂eqR2\) and \(k\), the goal is to decide whether \(P\) can be covered by the boundaries of at most \(k\) axis-parallel rectangles. In contrast to the discrete case, we show that \ is fixed-parameter tractable, with running time \(2(k k)· n(1)\), where \(n=|P|\). Our algorithm relies on a structural analysis of how \(k\) rectangles interact with the point set, reducing \ to at most \(2(k k)\) instances of , each solvable in polynomial time. On the hardness side, we prove NP-completeness for boundary covering by axis-aligned \(L\)-shapes and use this reduction to establish NP-completeness of .

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…