Topological Signatures of Imperial Collapse and Fragmentation: Administrative Dissolution, Territorial Reorganization and Early-Warning Observables in the Han Dynasty Network (206~BCE\,--\,220~CE)

Abstract

We extend the persistent homology formalism done in references~paper1,paper2 to the Han Dynasty (206~BCE--220~CE), testing whether the collapse threshold = 0.5241 and the three-network decomposition methodology established for the Roman--Byzantine case generalize to a mechanistically distinct imperial system. Three complementary networks are constructed from geospatial and historical data: an administrative network (, 392~prefectures from CHGIS~v6), a geographic network (, with node end-dates extended beyond administrative dissolution), and an 81-node Silk Road trade network () as a structural control. Edge costs are derived via least-cost path analysis on a 1~km/pixel digital elevation model, modulated by five historical friction channels. collapses to zero at 220~CE (phase~G slope -0.0261~yr-1, R2 = 0.689) while simultaneously increases to 3.065, producing a divergence ΔH = 3.065 -- the topological signature of internal fragmentation. The cross-network Wasserstein distance W×(Admin,Geo) jumps from exactly zero to 737 at d=190~CE, one decade after the Yellow Turban Rebellion, and three long-lived β1 cycles matching the Wei, Shu, and Wu domains emerge under the post-184~CE fragmentation model -- thirty years before formal partition. Three independent early-warning indicators (Wasserstein velocity W2, correlation length ξ, and the Integrated Change Tracker) signal collapse onset 45--50~years before formal dissolution.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…