Bridge distances for networks

Abstract

Let G = (V,E) be a finite directed graph with a non-negative real length μe assigned to every directed edge e ∈ E. We assume that μe = +∞ for every non-edge e ∈ E. Fix any two distinct vertices a, b ∈ V. A directed path from a to b is called an (a,b)-path. An edge e is called an (a,b)-bridge if it belongs to all (a,b)-paths. Furthermore, it is not difficult to show that all (a,b)-paths pass all (a,b)-bridges in the same order. Define the distance μ(a,b) from a to b as the sum of lengths of all (a,b)-bridges. Furthermore, μ(a,b) = ∞ if there are no (a,b)-paths and μ(a,b) = 0 if (a,b)-paths exist but there are no (a,b)-bridges. It is easily seen that μ(a,b) can be computed in polynomial time and the metric inequality μ(a,b) ≤ μ(a,c) + μ(c,b) holds for every a,b,c ∈ V. Furthermore, equality holds if and only if each (a,b)-bridge is either an (a,c)- or a (c,b)-bridge. We will show that this is a special limit case r=s → 0 of the inequality μ(a,b)s/r ≤ μ(a,c)s/r + μ(c,b)s/r obtained for all positive real parameters r and s in the paper ``Metric and ultrametric inequalities for directed graphs'', Discrete Appl. Math. 314 (2022) 93--104, along with 3 other limit cases r=s → ∞, r=1, s → ∞, and s = 1, r → 0, considered in that paper.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…