Performance Benchmarking and Optimisation of Clustering Algorithms for Local and Non-Local Similarity Measure in Medical Image Analysis

Abstract

Medical imaging generates high-resolution images posing significant storage, transmission, and computational challenges. While low-rank matrix approximation (LoRMA) techniques offer efficient compression by exploiting structural redundancy, global approaches often fail to preserve local details critical for diagnosis. This paper focuses on clustering techniques that exploit non-local self-similarity to identify structurally similar regions in medical images. These clusters can be used for post-processing tasks such as adaptive image compression. We evaluate five clustering techniques: k-means, mini-batch k-means, agglomerative hierarchical clustering, balanced iterative reducing and clustering using hierarchies (BIRCH), and bisecting k-means across MRI, ultrasound, and chest X-ray modalities. All clustering techniques were optimised using random search, and cluster quality was assessed using the Silhouette score, the Davies-Bouldin (DB) index, and the Calinski-Harabasz (CH) index. Results demonstrate that standard k-means and bisecting k-means generally achieve strong cluster cohesion and separation across modalities. However, they tend to form a small number of clusters with high intra-cluster variability, limiting their effectiveness for post-processing tasks such as adaptive compression. Agglomerative clustering outperformed other techniques for MRI and ultrasound in terms of intra-cluster homogeneity, making it more suitable for preserving fine diagnostic details. For chest X-rays, mini-batch k-means achieved the best balance between clustering quality and intra-cluster compactness. BIRCH consistently underperformed across all modalities.