Threshold Dynamics and Correlated Prophet Inequalities

Abstract

Prophet inequalities have become a central tool for analyzing the performance of online algorithms. However, most existing results assume that input random variables are independent, which limits their applicability. Motivated by this gap, we study prophet inequalities under two correlation models induced by a latent state of the world variable Z. In the common-base model, the algorithm observes the sequence Z+X1,…,Z+Xn. We analyze single-threshold algorithms with the constraint that they always accept the final item, guaranteeing a reward of at least Z. When Z is chosen adversarially, we characterize the optimal deterministic algorithm of this form, achieving a competitive ratio of 0.381. We then show that randomizing improves the guarantee to 0.4. By a minimax argument, the same ratio is achievable when Z is random. We depart from standard techniques by establishing a stronger lower bound of 0.41 and an upper bound of 0.475, ruling out the possibility that this class of algorithms attains the 1/2 ratio known for independent inputs. The core technical contribution is a new analytical framework that captures the reward dynamics of single-threshold algorithms. We introduce a differential equation characterizing the expected reward of a threshold in the worst-case instance, parameterized by the distribution of the maximum. This equation admits a closed-form and unifies known single-threshold prophet inequalities, yielding a simple threshold-optimality condition applicable to the common-base model. Finally, we study the common-scale model, where inputs take the form Z· X1,…,Z· Xn. We show that this minimal multiplicative correlation yields strong impossibility results: no algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio exceeding 1/n.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…