Optimal history encoding for elastic-plastic hereditary laws: Sharp input and constitutive approximation

Abstract

We formulate rate-independent elastic-ideally-plastic response directly in hereditary form and study its approximation by finite history surrogates. At the material-point level, the constitutive law is the vector play operator generated by metric projection onto a closed convex elastic domain in stress space. Starting from the closest-point return mapping for step inputs, we pass to absolutely continuous driving histories, for which the constitutive law admits a differential form: the stress remains in the elastic domain and the difference of rates belongs almost everywhere to the normal cone. In this W1,1 setting, the hereditary law is causal, contracts variation, and satisfies a BV-to-L∞ stability estimate. We then approximate histories by right-continuous step surrogates with at most N constant pieces. For absolutely continuous inputs, we prove a sharp minimax theorem for input approximation in L∞, normalized by the BV norm: the optimal encoder is given by equal-variation sampling. For constitutive approximation, the correct vector-valued minimax statement is obtained by allowing the encoder to be material-law aware: it may compress the exact stress history P(π) rather than only the driving history π. The resulting stress-aware encoder, followed by the same discrete hereditary decoder, gives the sharp value (2N)-1 under the natural nondegeneracy assumption 0∈intC. The scalar complementary-variable case is also recorded: there the input equal-variation encoder is sharp because the scalar stop/play operator is L∞-nonexpansive in the complementary variable. The results identify cumulative variation as the natural variable for sampling and compressing both driving and constitutive histories.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…