Simultaneous popular polynomial differences over finite fields
Abstract
Green's popular difference theorem says that for every \(>0\), all sufficiently large primes \(p\), and every set \(A⊂eq Fp\) of density \(α\), there exists a nonzero \(d∈ Fp\) such that \[ Ex∈ Fp 1A(x)1A(x+d)1A(x+2d) ≥ α3-. \] We show that a stronger simultaneous popular difference phenomenon holds for polynomial configurations. Namely, if P=\P1,…,Pk\ ⊂ Z[t] is a fixed collection of linearly independent polynomials with zero constant terms, we show that for every \(>0\), all sufficiently large primes \(p\), and every set \(A⊂eq Fp\) of density \(α\), there exists a nonzero \(d∈ Fp\) such that \[ Ex∈ Fp 1A(x) Πi=1k 1A(x+Pi(d))ωi ≥ α1+Σiωi- \] simultaneously for every \(ω=(ω1,…,ωk)∈\0,1\k\). We also show that such simultaneous popular difference phenomena have sharp limitations by proving that for every sufficiently large prime \(p\), there is a constant \(c>0\) such that, for all sufficiently large \(n\), one can find a set \(A⊂eq Fpn\) of density \(1/2+on(1)\) satisfying \[ d≠ 0 \ Ex∈ Fpn 1A(x)1A(x+d)1A(x+2d), Ex∈ Fpn 1A(x)1A(x+2d)1A(x+4d) \ ≤ 18-c. \] That is, the strengthening of Green's result, in this case over Fpn for p fixed and n tending to infinity, requiring that both \(d\) and \(2d\) are simultaneously popular differences for three-term arithmetic progressions is false.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.