Coercivity structure of positive-type memory: exact gaps, critical horizons, and singular limits

Abstract

We study diffusion equations with positive-type memory in the degenerate regime where the instantaneous diffusion may lose coercivity. The basic question is simple: can a completely monotone memory term replace the missing L2(0,;V) coercivity? The answer is negative in the instantaneous energy space. The obstruction is measured by the memory coercivity symbol m, defined through the Bernstein representation of the kernel and equal to Rek whenever k∈ L1(0,∞). For kernels of finite L1-mass, an exact frequency identity expresses the gap between the instantaneous energy and the memory dissipation as the spectral weight 1-m(ω); provided that the memory form is non-trivial, the gap is non-negative for all states and all time horizons precisely when kL1(0,∞)≤1. At a fixed horizon, the threshold is instead the finite-horizon coercivity profile Λk(), whose unit crossing defines a critical horizon and which applies also to kernels of infinite L1-mass, including the fractional kernels. For every locally integrable completely monotone kernel, however, m(ω)0 as |ω|∞. Therefore, positive-type memory is dissipative, but it is not frequency-uniformly coercive: no constant c>0 makes the memory dissipation dominate c∫0a1(u,u). This is a no-go theorem, and we make the deficit quantitative through a coercivity-gap index ρ∈[0,2], valid for every non-constant kernel. Finally, the whole coercivity structure is discontinuous under weak-* convergence of the associated time measures. The graph-space well-posedness theory motivated by this no-go result, and the certified stability it targets, are developed in a companion paper.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…