Calibration of Nebular Emission-line Diagnostics: II. Abundances

Abstract

(Abridged) We examine standard methods of measuring nebular chemical abundances, including estimates based on direct Te measurements, and also bright-line diagnostics. We use observations of 4 LMC HII regions whose ionizing stars have classifications ranging from O7 to WN3. We assume a 2-zone Te structure to compute ionic abundances. We compare with photoionization models tailored to the properties of the individual objects, and emphasize the importance of correctly relating Te in the two zones, which can otherwise cause errors of ~0.2 dex in abundance estimates. There are no spatial variations to within 0.1 - 0.15 dex in any of the objects, even one hosting 3 WR stars. Our data agree with the modeled R23 and S23 diagnostics of O and S. We present the first theoretical tracks for S23, which are in excellent agreement with a larger dataset. However, contrary to earlier suggestions, S23 is much more sensitive to the ionization parameter than is R23, because S23 does not sample S IV. We therefore introduce S234 = ([SII]+[SIII]+[SIV])/H-beta. Predicted and observed spatial variations in S234 are dramatically reduced in contrast to S23. The intensity of [SIV]10.5 microns is easily estimated from a simple relation between [SIV]/[SIII] and [OIII]/[OII]. This method of estimating S234 yields excellent agreement with our models, hence we give a theoretical calibration for S234. The double-valued structure of S23 and S234 remains an important problem as for R23, and presently we consider the S diagnostics reliable only at Z < 0.5 Zsol. However, the slightly larger dynamic range and excellent compatibility with theoretical predictions suggest the S diagnostics to be more effective abundance indicators than R23.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…