Primordial non-Gaussianity: local curvature method and statistical significance of constraints on fNL from WMAP data
Abstract
We test the consistency of estimates of the non-linear coupling constant fNL using non-Gaussian CMB maps generated by the method described in (Liguori, Matarrese and Moscardini 2003). This procedure to obtain non-Gaussian maps differs significantly from the method used in previous works on estimation of fNL. Nevertheless, using spherical wavelets, we find results in very good agreement with (Mukherjee and Wang 2004), showing that the two ways of generating primordial non-Gaussian maps give equivalent results. Moreover, we introduce a new method for estimating the non-linear coupling constant from CMB observations by using the local curvature of the temperature fluctuation field. We present both Bayesian credible regions (assuming a flat prior) and proper (frequentist) confidence intervals on fNL, and discuss the relation between the two approaches. The Bayesian approach tends to yield lower error bars than the frequentist approach, suggesting that a careful analysis of the different interpretations is needed. Using this method, we estimate fNL=-10+270-260 at the 2σ level (Bayesian) and fNL=-10+310-270 (frequentist). Moreover, we find that the wavelet and the local curvature approaches, which provide similar error bars, yield approximately uncorrelated estimates of fNL and therefore, as advocated in (Cabella et al. 2004), the estimates may be combined to reduce the error bars. In this way, we obtain fNL=-5 85 and fNL=-5 175 at the 1σ and 2σ level respectively using the frequentist approach.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.