Cosmology and the Halo Occupation Distribution from Small-Scale Galaxy Clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

Abstract

We use the projected correlation function wp(rp) of a volume-limited subsample of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) main galaxy redshift catalogue to measure the halo occupation distribution (HOD) of the galaxies of the sample. Simultaneously, we allow the cosmology to vary within cosmological constraints imposed by cosmic microwave background experiments in a Lambda-CDM model. We find that combining wp(rp) for this sample alone with the observations by WMAP, ACBAR, CBI and VSA can provide one of the most precise techniques available to measure cosmological parameters. For a minimal flat six-parameter Lambda-CDM model with an HOD with three free parameters, we find Omegam=0.278+0.027-0.027, sigma8=0.812+0.028-0.027, and H0=69.8+2.6-2.6km s-1 Mpc-1; these errors are significantly smaller than from CMB alone and similar to those obtained by combining CMB with the large-scale galaxy power spectrum assuming scale-independent bias. The corresponding HOD parameters describing the minimum halo mass and the normalization and cut-off of the satellite mean occupation are Mmin=(3.03+0.36-0.36)x 1012 h-1 Msun, M1 = (4.58+0.60-0.60)x 1013 h-1 Msun, and kappa=4.44+0.51-0.69. When more parameters are added to the HOD model, the error bars on the HOD parameters increase because of degeneracies, but the error bars on the cosmological parameters do not increase greatly. Similar modeling for other galaxy samples could reduce the statistical errors on these results, while more thorough investigations of the cosmology dependence of nonlinear halo bias and halo mass functions are needed to eliminate remaining systematic uncertainties, which may be comparable to statistical uncertainties.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…