Constraining beta(z) and Omegam from redshift-space distortions in z~3 galaxy surveys
Abstract
We use sample of 813 Lyman-break galaxies (LBGs) with 2.6<z<3.4 to perform a detailed analysis of the redshift-space (z-space) distortions in their clustering pattern and from them derive confidence levels in the [Omegam,beta(z=3)] plane. We model the z-space distortions in the shape of the correlation function measured in orthogonal directions, xi(sigma,pi). This modeling requires an accurate description of the real-space correlation function to be given as an input. From the projection of xi(sigma,pi) in the angular direction, wp(sigma), we derive the best fitting amplitude and slope for the LBG real-space correlation function: r0=4.48(+0.17)(-0.18) h(-1) Mpc and gamma=1.76(+0.08)(-0.09) (xi(r)= (r/r0)-gamma). A comparison between the shape of xi(s) and wp(sigma) suggests that xi(r) deviates from a simple power-law model, with a break at ~9 h(-1) Mpc. This model is consistent with the observed projected correlation function. However, due to the limited size of the fields used, the wp(sigma) results are limited to sigma < 10 h(-1) Mpc. Assuming this double power-law model, and by analysing the shape distortions in xi(sigma,pi), we find the following constraints: beta(z=3) = 0.15 (+0.20)(-0.15), Omegam = 0.35 (+0.65)(-0.22). Combining these results with orthogonal constraints from linear evolution of density perturbations, we find that beta(z=3) = 0.25 (+0.05)(-0.06), Omegam = 0.55 (+0.45)(-0.16).
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.