Topology Analysis of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: I. Scale and Luminosity Dependences

Abstract

We measure the topology of volume-limited galaxy samples selected from a parent sample of 314,050 galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey(SDSS), which is now complete enough to describe the fully three-dimensional topology and its dependence on galaxy properties. We compare the observed genus statistic Gf) to predictions for a Gaussian random field and to the genus measured for mock surveys constructed from new large-volume simulations of the LambdaCDM cosmology. In this analysis we carefully examine the dependence of the observed genus statistic on the Gaussian smoothing scale RG from 3.5 to 11 h-1Mpc and on the luminosity of galaxies over the range -22.50<Mr<-18.5. The void multiplicity AV is less than unity at all smoothing scales. Because AV cannot become less than 1 through gravitational evolution, this result provides strong evidence for biased galaxy formation in low density environments. We also find clear evidence of luminosity bias of topology within the volume-limited sub-samples. The shift parameter Delta nu indicates that the genus of brighter galaxies shows a negative shift toward a ``meatball'' (i.e. cluster-dominated) topology, while faint galaxies show a positive shift toward a ``bubble'' (i.e. void-dominated) topology. The transition from negative to positive shift occurs approximately at the characteristic absolute magnitude Mr*=-20.4. Even in this analysis of the largest galaxy sample to date, we detect the influence of individual large-scale structures, as the shift parameter Delta nu and cluster multiplicity AC reflect (at ~3 sigma) the presence of the Sloan Great Wall and a X-shaped structure which runs for several hundred Mpc across the survey volume.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…