Relativistic MHD Winds from Rotating Neutron Stars

Abstract

We solve for the time-dependent dynamics of axisymmetric, general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic winds from rotating neutron stars. The mass loss rate is obtained self-consistently as a solution to the MHD equations, subject to a finite thermal pressure at the stellar surface. We consider both monopole and dipole magnetic field geometries and we explore the parameter regime extending from low magnetization (low-sigmao), almost thermally-driven winds to high magnetization (high-sigmao), relativistic Poynting-flux dominated outflows. We compute the angular momentum and rotational energy loss rates as a function of sigmao and compare with analytic expectations from the classical theory of pulsars and magnetized stellar winds. In the case of the monopole, our high-sigmao calculations asymptotically approach the analytic force-free limit. If we define the spindown rate in terms of the open magnetic flux, we similarly reproduce the spindown rate from recent force-free calculations of the aligned dipole. However, even for sigmao as high as ~20, we find that the location of the Y-type point (rY), which specifies the radius of the last closed field line in the equatorial plane, is not the radius of the light cylinder RL = c/omega (R = cylindrical radius), as has previously been assumed in most estimates and force-free calculations. Instead, although the Alfven radius at intermediate latitudes quickly approaches RL as sigmao exceeds unity, rY remains significantly less than RL. Because rY < RL, our calculated spindown rates thus exceed the classic ``vacuum dipole'' rate. We discussthe implications of our results for models of rotation-powered pulsars and magnetars, both in their observed states and in their hypothesized rapidly rotating initial state.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…