New perspectives on strong z=0.5 MgII absorbers: are halo-mass and equivalent width anti-correlated?

Abstract

We measure the mean halo-mass of z=0.5 MgII absorbers using the cross-correlation (over co-moving scales 0.05-13h-1Mpc) between 1806 MgII quasar absorption systems and ~250,000 Luminous Red Galaxies (LRGs), both selected from the SDSS DR3. The MgII systems have rest-frame equivalent widths Wr(2796)>=0.3A. From the ratio of the MgII-LRG cross-correlation to the LRG-LRG auto-correlation, we find that the bias ratio between MgII absorbers and LRGs is 0.65+/-0.08, which implies that the absorber host-galaxies have a mean halo-mass 20-40 times smaller than that of the LRGs; the MgII absorbers have halos of mean mass <logMh(Msol)>=11.94+/-0.31(stat)+/-0.25(sys). We demonstrate that this statistical technique, which does not require any spectroscopic follow-up, does not suffer from contaminants such as stars or foreground and background galaxies. Finally, we find that the absorber halo-mass is anti-correlated with the equivalent width. If MgII absorbers were virialized in galaxy halos a positive Mh-Wr correlation would have been observed since Wr(2796) is a direct measure of the velocity spread of the MgII sub-components. Thus, our results demonstrate that the individual clouds of a MgII system are not virialized in the gaseous halos of the host-galaxies. We review past results in the literature on the statistics of MgII absorbers and find that they too require an Mh-Wr anti-correlation. When combined with measurements of the equivalent width distribution, the Mh-Wr anti-correlation naturally explains why absorbers with Wr(2796)>=2A are not seen at large impact parameters. We interpret the Mh-Wr anti-correlation within the starburst scenario where strong MgII absorbers are produced by supernovae-driven winds.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…