Measurements of the Cosmological Parameters Omega and Lambda from the First 7 Supernovae at z >= 0.35

Abstract

We have developed a technique to systematically discover and study high-redshift supernovae that can be used to measure the cosmological parameters. We report here results based on the initial seven of >28 supernovae discovered to date in the high-redshift supernova search of the Supernova Cosmology Project. We find a dispersion in peak magnitudes of sigmaMB = 0.27 this dispersion narrows to sigmaMB,corr = 0.19 after "correcting" the magnitudes using the light-curve "width-luminosity" relation found for nearby (z <= 0.1) type Ia supernovae from the Calan/Tololo survey (Hamuy et al. 1996). Comparing lightcurve-width-corrected magnitudes as a function of redshift of our distant (z = 0.35-0.46) supernovae to those of nearby type Ia supernovae yields a global measurement of the mass density, OmegaM = 0.88+0.69-0.60 for a Lambda = 0 cosmology. For a spatially flat universe (i.e., OmegaM +OmegaLambda = 1), we find OmegaM = 0.94 +0.34-0.28 or, equivalently, a measurement of the cosmological constant, OmegaLambda = 0.06 +0.28-0.34 (<0.51 at the 95% confidence level). For the more general Friedmann-Lemaitre cosmologies with independent OmegaM and OmegaLambda, the results are presented as a confidence region on the OmegaM-OmegaLambda plane. This region does not correspond to a unique value of the deceleration parameter q0. We present analyses and checks for statistical and systematic errors, and also show that our results do not depend on the specifics of the width-luminosity correction. The results for OmegaLambda-versus-OmegaM are inconsistent with Lambda-dominated, low density, flat cosmologies that have been proposed to reconcile the ages of globular cluster stars with higher Hubble constant values.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…