Globular Clusters in Dense Clusters of Galaxies

Abstract

Deep imaging data from the Keck II telescope are employed to study the globular cluster (GC) populations in the cores of six rich Abell clusters. The sample includes A754, A1644, A2124, A2147, A2151, and A2152, and spans the redshift range z = 0.035-0.066. The clusters also range in morphology from spiral-rich, irregular systems to centrally concentrated cD clusters rich in early-type galaxies. Globular cluster specific frequencies SN and luminosity function dispersions are measured for a total of 9 galaxies in six central fields. The measured values of SN for the six brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) are all higher than typical values for giant ellipticals, in accord with the known SN-density correlations. The three non-BCGs analyzed also have elevated values of SN, confirming that central location is a primary factor. The number of GCs per unit mass for these fields are consistent with those found in an earlier sample, giving further evidence that GC number scales with mass and that the SN variations are due to a deficit of halo light, i.e., SN reflects mass-to-light ratio. The discussion builds on an earlier suggestion that the GCs (both metal rich and metal poor) around the central cluster galaxies were assembled at early times, and that star formation halted prematurely in the central galaxies at the epoch of cluster collapse. This is consistent with recent simulations of BCG/cluster formation. The subsequent addition of luminous material through cluster dynamical evolution can cause SN to decrease, and we may be seeing the first evidence of this. Finally, the GC luminosity function measurements are used to constrain the relative distances of the three clusters that make up the Hercules supercluster.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…