Reply to Suslov

Abstract

In a recent submission to this archive arXiv:cond-mat/0105325, Suslov has claimed that our recent numerical estimate of the critical exponent of the Anderson transition $ν=1.57\pm.02$ is in error and that the available numerical data are consistent with a value of $ν=1$. We contest this claim and demonstrate using Suslov's own scaling procedure that $ν\ne 1$