Comment on ``Renormalization-group picture of the Lifshitz critical behavior''
H. W. Diehl, M. Shpot
Abstract
We show that the recent renormalization-group analysis of Lifshitz critical behavior presented by Leite [Phys. Rev. B 67, 104415 (2003)] suffers from a number of severe deficiencies. In particular, we show that his approach does not give an ultraviolet finite renormalized theory, is plagued by inconsistencies, misses the existence of a nontrivial anisotropy exponent θ 1/2, and therefore yields incorrect hyperscaling relations. His ε-expansion results to order ε2 for the critical exponents of m-axial Lifshitz points are incorrect both in the anisotropic (0<m<d) and the isotropic cases (m=d). The inherent inconsistencies and the lack of a sound basis of the approach makes its results unacceptable even if they are interpreted in the sense of approximations.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Partial Localization and Multifractality in Heterogeneous Population Growth with Resetting
Maximilien Bernard, Giuseppe Del Vecchio Del Vecchio, Jean-Philippe Bouchaud et al.
Sluggish random walks with resetting: nonequilibrium aspects
Theophilus Dwamena Frimpong, Léa Bresque, Edgar Roldán
Spin-1/2 Heisenberg diamond-like decorated honeycomb lattice in a magnetic field from the perspective of localized magnons and exact diagonalization
Katarina Karlova, Malo Rouxel, Jozef Strecka et al.
Twist-controlled thermodynamic anomalies in bilayer q-state clock models
Ze-Heng Yu, Liang He
Diffusion-Induced Stabilization of Nonreciprocal Wealth Dynamics
Pierre Bousseyroux, Gilles Zérah, Michael Benzaquen
Synchronization induced by stochastic subsystem resetting in complex networks
Kevin Paramero-Arias, Alejandro P. Riascos