Free energy landscapes, dynamics and the edge of chaos in mean-field models of spin glasses

Abstract

Metastable states in Ising spin-glass models are studied by finding iterative solutions of mean-field equations for the local magnetizations. Two different equations are studied: the TAP equations which are exact for the SK model, and the simpler `naive-mean-field' (NMF) equations. The free-energy landscapes that emerge are very different. For the TAP equations, the numerical studies confirm the analytical results of Aspelmeier et al., which predict that TAP states consist of close pairs of minima and index-one (one unstable direction) saddle points, while for the NMF equations saddle points with large indices are found. For TAP the barrier height between a minimum and its nearby saddle point scales as (f-f0)-1/3 where f is the free energy per spin of the solution and f0 is the equilibrium free energy per spin. This means that for `pure states', for which f-f0 is of order 1/N, the barriers scale as N1/3, but between states for which f-f0 is of order one the barriers are finite and also small so such metastable states will be of limited physical significance. For the NMF equations there are saddles of index K and we can demonstrate that their complexity SigmaK scales as a function of K/N. We have also employed an iterative scheme with a free parameter that can be adjusted to bring the system of equations close to the `edge of chaos'. Both for the TAP and NME equations it is possible with this approach to find metastable states whose free energy per spin is close to f0. As N increases, it becomes harder and harder to find solutions near the edge of chaos, but nevertheless the results which can be obtained are competitive with those achieved by more time-consuming computing methods and suggest that this method may be of general utility.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…