Reply to the Comment on the paper "Non-mean-field behavior of the contact process on scale-free networks"
C. Castellano, R. Pastor-Satorras
Abstract
The Comment by Ha et al. [cond-mat/0603787] criticizes our recent result [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 038701 (2006)] that the contact process (CP) on uncorrelated scale-free (SF) networks does not behave according to heterogeneous mean-field (MF) theory. This claim is based in Gaussian ansatz that reproduces previously reported density fluctuations and numerical simulations for a particular value of the degree exponent γ that seem to fit the MF prediction for the density decay exponent θ and a conjecture of the authors of the comment for the finite-size scaling exponente α=β/ ν. By means of extensive simulations of the CP on random neighbors (RN) SF networks we show that the MF prediction for θ4 is incorrect for small degree exponents, while the author's conjecture for α is at best only approximately valid for the unphysical case of uncorrelated networks with cut-off kc N1/(γ-1)$, which can only be constructed in the RN version of SF networks. Therefore, the main conclusion of our paper [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 038701 (2006)], the invalidity of MF theory for real uncorrelated SF networks, remains unchallenged.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Coupling spherical p-spin systems
Riccardo Cipolloni, Leticia F. Cugliandolo
Bias-Induced Crossover in Absolute Capacity of Dense Associative Memory
Yuto Sakurai, Takeaki Shimokawa, Kazunori Iwata et al.
Latent kinetic Ising models of neural spike trains
Davide Ghio, David Saad
Nonlocal Magic across the Many-Body Localization Crossover
Shan-Zhong Li, Zhi Li
Statistical levels and spatial modes of Fock-space heterogeneity in many-body localization crossovers
Yu-Jing Liu, Chen Cheng
Disorder-Tailored Delocalization
Yeongjun Kim, Supriyo Ghosh, Sergej Flach