Low Ambiguity in Strong, Total, Associative, One-Way Functions
Abstract
Rabi and Sherman present a cryptographic paradigm based on associative, one-way functions that are strong (i.e., hard to invert even if one of their arguments is given) and total. Hemaspaandra and Rothe proved that such powerful one-way functions exist exactly if (standard) one-way functions exist, thus showing that the associative one-way function approach is as plausible as previous approaches. In the present paper, we study the degree of ambiguity of one-way functions. Rabiand Sherman showed that no associative one-way function (over a universe having at least two elements) can be unambiguous (i.e., one-to-one). Nonetheless, we prove that if standard, unambiguous, one-way functions exist, then there exist strong, total, associative, one-way functions that are O(n)-to-one. This puts a reasonable upper bound on the ambiguity.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.