Lead, Follow, or Go Your Own Way: Empirical Evidence Against Leader-Follower Behavior in Electronic Markets
Karen Clay, Michael Smith, Eric Wolff
Abstract
Low search costs in Internet markets can be used by consumers to find low prices, but can also be used by retailers to monitor competitors' prices. This price monitoring can lead to price matching, resulting in dampened price competition and higher prices in some cases. This paper analyzes price data for 316 bestselling, computer, and random book titles gathered from 32 retailers between August 1999 and January 2000. In contrast to previous studies we find no evidence of leader-follow behavior for the vast majority of retailers we study. Further, the few cases of leader-follow behavior we observe seem to be associated with managerial convenience as opposed to anti-competitive behavior. We offer a methodology that can be used by future academic researchers or government regulators to check for anti-competitive price matching behavior in future time periods or in additional product categories.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Adversarial Attacks Reveal Divergent Deception Competence in Humans and Generative Language Models
Lucca Pfründer, Riccardo Loconte, Bruno Verschuere et al.
Who Can Say No? Control, Accountability and the Pace of Frontier AI
Rikard Rosenbacke, Carl Rosenbacke, Victor Rosenbacke et al.
Developing Competency in AI Ethics: A training framework
Alexandra Prégent, Alexei Grinbaum
Large Language Models, Machine-Assisted Cultural Analytics, and the Agentic Turn
Andres Karjus
What Counts as Evidence? Epistemic Cue Utilization in Large Language Models
Jinchang Zhang, Kaijun Jiang, Guoyu Lu
Knowing Is Not Telling: Identity Ossification in LLM Representations of Trans-border Communities
Minglu Sun, Lan Chen, Hang Jiang