Permutation graphs, fast forward permutations, and sampling the cycle structure of a permutation
Boaz Tsaban
Abstract
A permutation P on 1,..,N is afastforwardpermutation if for each m the computational complexity of evaluating Pm(x)$ is small independently of m and x. Naor and Reingold constructed fast forward pseudorandom cycluses and involutions. By studying the evolution of permutation graphs, we prove that the number of queries needed to distinguish a random cyclus from a random permutation on 1,..,N is Theta(N) if one does not use queries of the form Pm(x), but is only Theta(1) if one is allowed to make such queries. We construct fast forward permutations which are indistinguishable from random permutations even when queries of the form Pm(x) are allowed. This is done by introducing an efficient method to sample the cycle structure of a random permutation, which in turn solves an open problem of Naor and Reingold.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Inference-Engine Fingerprinting Attacks are Practical: Exploring Model-Driven Environmental Discovery, Exploitation, and Escape
Sarah Radway, Andrew Cheng, Vijay Janapa Reddi et al.
Weather Data Spoofing Attacks on Rain-Adaptive Millimeter-Wave Frequency Selection in V2X Communication Networks
Rasheed Bello, Idreez Yusuf, Justice Adjei Owusu et al.
Empirical Analysis of Randomness Quality in Differential Privacy Mechanisms
Cesare Gerolimetto Fabrello, Valeria Rossi, Alberto Trombetta et al.
Towards TEE-Certified DP: Verifiable Differentially Private Training on Legacy GPUs
Li Ge, Wenjie Qu, Weitao Feng et al.
Fingerprinting Multimodal Large Language Models
Chao Huang, Meng Tong, Kejiang Chen
The More It Says, the More You Pay: A Black-Box Audit of Provider-Side Token Inflation in LLM Services
Leilei Chen, Lan Zhang, Chen Tang et al.