Embedding Default Logic in Propositional Argumentation Systems
Dritan Berzati, Bernhard Anrig, Juerg Kohlas
Abstract
In this paper we present a transformation of finite propositional default theories into so-called propositional argumentation systems. This transformation allows to characterize all notions of Reiter's default logic in the framework of argumentation systems. As a consequence, computing extensions, or determining wether a given formula belongs to one extension or all extensions can be answered without leaving the field of classical propositional logic. The transformation proposed is linear in the number of defaults.
Create a lesson
Related papers
RAFT: A Stateful Retrieval-Augmented Framework for Troubleshooting Agents
Mingxuan Zhang, Xiaowen Wang, Anupma Sharan et al.
Q&A on Any Spreadsheet Requires Interpreting Its Grid Structure
Zofia Smoleń
Deep Noir: Autonomous Steering Discovery via Architectural Chronometry in Transformer Models
Frank E. Bobe, Gregory D. Vetaw, Darshan W. Bryner et al.
Ownership in AI-Assisted Everyday Tasks
Megan Wei, Melanie Subbiah, Audrey Lee et al.
PAA: The Probabilistic Allen Algebra: A Generative and Complete Probabilistic Extension of Allen's Interval Relations
Julian Eggert
Limits of Confidence in Diffusion
Russ Webb, Amitis Shidani, Alice Bizeul et al.