Downward Collapse from a Weaker Hypothesis
Edith Hemaspaandra, Lane A. Hemaspaandra, Harald Hempel
Abstract
Hemaspaandra et al. proved that, for m > 0 and 0 < i < k - 1: if Σip DIFFm(Σkp) is closed under complementation, then DIFFm(Σkp) = coDIFFm(Σkp). This sharply asymmetric result fails to apply to the case in which the hypothesis is weakened by allowing the Σip to be replaced by any class in its difference hierarchy. We so extend the result by proving that, for s,m > 0 and 0 < i < k - 1: if DIFFs(Σip) DIFFm(Σkp) is closed under complementation, then DIFFm(Σkp) = coDIFFm(Σkp).
Create a lesson
Related papers
How far is Kolmogorov-Loveland randomness from Martin-Löf randomness?
Tomislav Petrović
The Complexity of Finding Additional Solutions
Saman Farhat
On the Hardness of 4-to-1 Games with Perfect Completeness
Yumou Fei, Dor Minzer, Shuo Wang
Near-Inverse-Linear Barriers for Explicit Affine Witness Isolation
Sebastian Ben Daniel
∃ R ⊂eq CH
Alex Meiburg
Primal/Dual Method for the Grothendieck Constant
Steven Heilman, Chris Jones, Giulio Malavolta