Downward Collapse from a Weaker Hypothesis

Abstract

Hemaspaandra et al. proved that, for m > 0 and 0 < i < k - 1: if ip DIFFm(kp) is closed under complementation, then DIFFm(kp) = coDIFFm(kp). This sharply asymmetric result fails to apply to the case in which the hypothesis is weakened by allowing the ip to be replaced by any class in its difference hierarchy. We so extend the result by proving that, for s,m > 0 and 0 < i < k - 1: if DIFFs(ip) DIFFm(kp) is closed under complementation, then DIFFm(kp) = coDIFFm(kp).

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…