The CKM Matrix and The Unitarity Triangle: Another Look
Andrzej J. Buras, Fabrizio Parodi, Achille Stocchi
Abstract
The unitarity triangle can be determined by means of two measurements of its sides or angles. Assuming the same relative errors on the angles (α,β,γ) and the sides (Rb,Rt), we find that the pairs (γ,β) and (γ,Rb) are most efficient in determining (,η) that describe the apex of the unitarity triangle. They are followed by (α,β), (α,Rb), (Rt,β), (Rt,Rb) and (Rb,β). As the set , , Rt and β appears to be the best candidate for the fundamental set of flavour violating parameters in the coming years, we show various constraints on the CKM matrix in the (Rt,β) plane. Using the best available input we determine the universal unitarity triangle for models with minimal flavour violation (MFV) and compare it with the one in the Standard Model. We present allowed ranges for 2β, 2α, γ, Rb, Rt and ΔMs within the Standard Model and MFV models. We also update the allowed range for the function Ftt that parametrizes various MFV-models.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Electromagnetic form factors of vector mesons in Einstein-dilaton holographic QCD
Alfonso Ballon-Bayona, Tobias Frederico, Luis A. H. Mamani et al.
An invertible map between 3D Breit-frame mechanical distributions and 2D infinite-momentum-frame mechanical densities in spin-1 hadrons
Kemal Tezgin
Adiabatic hydrodynamization with transverse spatial gradients in boost-invariant plasmas
Uri Sharell, Jasmine Brewer, Weiyao Ke
Line shapes of Ω(2012) production in the Ξ K and Ξπ K decay channels
Natsumi Ikeno, Eulogio Oset
A quantum representation of π fragmentation functions through variational quantum circuits
David F. Rentería-Estrada, Roger J. Hernández-Pinto, Germán Rodrigo et al.
Particle Physics Driven by Quantum Technology - Quantum Simulations and Quantum Sensing
Itay M. Bloch, Marcela Carena, Yifan Chen et al.