High-precision determination of the light-quark masses from realistic lattice QCD

Abstract

Three-flavor lattice QCD simulations and two-loop perturbation theory are used to make the most precise determination to date of the strange-, up-, and down-quark masses, ms, mu, and md, respectively. Perturbative matching is required in order to connect the lattice-regularized bare- quark masses to the masses as defined in the scheme, and this is done here for the first time at next-to-next-to leading (or two-loop) order. The bare-quark masses required as input come from simulations by the MILC collaboration of a highly-efficient formalism (using so-called ``staggered'' quarks), with three flavors of light quarks in the Dirac sea; these simulations were previously analyzed in a joint study by the HPQCD and MILC collaborations, using degenerate u and d quarks, with masses as low as ms/8, and two values of the lattice spacing, with chiral extrapolation/interpolation to the physical masses. With the new perturbation theory presented here, the resulting \ masses are ms(2 GeV) = 87(0)(4)(4)(0) MeV, and m(2 GeV) = 3.2(0)(2)(2)(0) MeV, where m = 12 (mu + md) is the average of the u and d masses. The respective uncertainties are from statistics, simulation systematics, perturbation theory, and electromagnetic/isospin effects. The perturbative errors are about a factor of two smaller than in an earlier study using only one-loop perturbation theory. Using a recent determination of the ratio mu/md = 0.43(0)(1)(0)(8) due to the MILC collaboration, these results also imply mu(2 GeV) = 1.9(0)(1)(1)(2) MeV and md(2 GeV) = 4.4(0)(2)(2)(2) MeV. A technique for estimating the next order in the perturbative expansion is also presented, which uses input from simulations at more than one lattice spacing.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…