The SuperWorlds of SU(5) and SU(5)xU(1): A Critical Assessment and Overview

Abstract

We present an overview of the simplest supergravity models which enforce radiative breaking of the electroweak symmetry, namely the minimal SU(5) supergravity model and the class of string-inspired/derived supergravity models based on the flipped SU(5)× U(1) structure supplemented by a minimal set of additional matter representations such that unification occurs at the string scale (1018). These models can be fully parametrized in terms of the top-quark mass, the ratio β=v2/v1, and three supersymmetry breaking parameters (m1/2,m0,A). The latter are chosen in the minimal SU(5) model such that the stringent constraints from proton decay and cosmology are satisfied. In the flipped SU(5) case we consider two string-inspired supersymmetry breaking scenaria: SU(N,1) no-scale supergravity and a dilaton-induced supersymmetry breaking scenario. Both imply universal soft supersymmetry breaking parameters: m0=A=0 and m0=13m1/2, A=-m1/2 respectively. We present a comparative study of the sparticle and Higgs spectra of both flipped SU(5) models and the minimal SU(5) model and conclude that all can be partially probed at the Tevatron and LEPII (and the flipped models at HERA too). In both flipped SU(5) cases there is a more constrained version which allows to determine β in terms of mt,m g and which leads to much sharper and readily accessible experimental predictions. We also discuss the prospects for indirect experimental detection: a non-trivial fraction of the parameter space of the flipped SU(5) models is in conflict with the present experimental allowed range for the b sγ rare decay mode, and the one-loop electroweak radiative corrections imply the 90\% CL upper bound

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…