Pade-Improvement of QCD Running Coupling Constants, Running Masses, Higgs Decay Rates, and Scalar Channel Sum Rules

Abstract

We discuss Pad\'e-improvement of known four-loop order results based upon an asymptotic three-parameter error formula for Pad\'e-approximants. We derive an explicit formula estimating the next-order coefficient R4 from the previous coefficients in a series 1+R1 x + R2x2 + R3x3. We show that such an estimate is within 0.18% of the known five-loop order term in the O(1) β-function, and within 10% of the known five-loop term in the O(1) anomalous mass-dimension function γm(g). We apply the same formula to generate a [2|2] Pad\'e-summation of the QCD β-function and anomalous mass dimension in order to demonstrate both the relative insensitivity of the evolution of αs(μ) and the running quark masses to higher order corrections, as well as a somewhat increased compatibility of the present empirical range for αs(mτ) with the range anticipated via evolution from the present empirical range for αs(Mz). For 3 ≤ nf ≤ 6 we demonstrate that positive zeros of any [2|2] Pad\'e-summation estimate of the all-orders β-function which incorporates known two-, three-, and four-loop contributions necessarily correspond to ultraviolet fixed points, regardless of the unknown five-loop term. Pad\'e-improvement of higher-order perturbative expressions is presented for the decay rates of the Higgs into two gluons and into a b b pair, and is used to show the relative insensitivity of these rates to higher order effects. However, Pad\'e-improvement of the purely-perturbative component of scalar/pseudoscalar current correlation functions is indicative of large theoretical uncertainties in QCD sum rules for these channels, particularly if the continuum-threshold parameter s0 is near 1 GeV2.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…