Unification of Cosmology and Second Law of Thermodynamics: Solving Cosmological Constant Problem, and Inflation

Abstract

We seek here to unify the second law of thermodynamics with the other laws, or at least to put up a law behind the second law of thermodynamics. Assuming no fine tuning, concretely by a random Hamiltonian, we argue just from equations of motion -- but without second law -- that entropy cannot go first up and then down again except with the rather strict restriction Slarge Ssmall 1 + Ssmall 2. Here Slarge is the "large" entropy in the middle era while Ssmall 1 and Ssmall 2 are the entropies at certain times before and after the Slarge - era respectively. From this theorem of "no strong maximum for the entropy" a cyclic time S1 model world could have entropy at the most varying by a factor two and would not be phenomenologically realistic. With an open ended time axis (-∞, ∞) = R some law behind the second law of thermodynamics is needed if we do not obtain as the most likely happening that the entropy is maximal (i.e. the heat death having already occurred from the start). We express such a law behind the second law -- or unification of second law with the other ones -- by assigning a probability weight P for finding the world/the system in various places in phase space. In such a model P is almost unified with the rest as P = exp (-2 ~SIm) with SIm going in as the imaginary part of the action. We derive quite naturally the second law for practical purposes, a Big Bang with two sided time directions and a need for a bottom in the Hamiltonian density. Assuming the cosmological constant is a dynamical variable in the sense that it is counted as "initial condition" we even solve in our model the cosmological constant problem without any allusion to anthropic principle.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…