The hexagonal versus the square lattice
Pieter Moree, Herman J. J. te Riele
Abstract
We establish Schmutz Schaller's conjecture that the hexagonal lattice is `better' than the square lattice. Schmutz Schaller (Bulletin of the AMS 35 (1998), p. 201), motivated by considerations from hyperbolic geometry, conjectured that in dimensions 2 to 8 the best known lattice sphere packings have `maximal lengths' and goes on to write: "In dimension 2 the conjecture means in particular that the hexagonal lattice is `better' than the square lattice. More precisely, let 0<h1<h2<... be the positive integers, listed in ascending order, which can be written as hi=x2+3y2 for integers x and y. Let 0<q1<q2<... be the positive integers, listed in ascending order, which can be written as qi=x2+y2 for integers x and y. Then the conjecture is that qi<=hi for i=1,2,3,..." Our proof requires computational prime number theory in combination with methods from a preprint of the first author (to appear in Math. Comp.), arXiv:math.NT/0112100.
Create a lesson
Related papers
An ergodic approach to equations of the form x+y=α(n)
Vitaly Bergelson, Hao Pan, Saúl Rodríguez Martín
Rogers--Ramanujan identities from the geometry of Xa=Yb
Yifeng Huang, Kenny Lau, Ken Ono
Computational results on sums of a prime with squares or cubes
Kenny Applegate, Kyle Pratt
Finding New Limit Points of Mahler Measure by Methods of Missing Data Restoration
Jean-Marc Sac-Épée, Souad El Otmani, Armand Maul et al.
Low moments of automorphic random multiplicative function sums
Sun-Kai Leung
A problem of Yang and Chen on weighted representation functions
Shuang-Shuang Li, Ya-Ting Xu, Xiao-Hui Yan