Algebraic Solutions of the Lamé Equation, Revisited
Robert S. Maier
Abstract
A minor error in the necessary conditions for the algebraic form of the Lamé equation to have a finite projective monodromy group, and hence for it to have only algebraic solutions, is pointed out. [See F. Baldassarri, "On algebraic solutions of Lamé's differential equation", J. Differential Equations 41 (1981), 44-58.] It is shown that if the group is the octahedral group S4, then the degree parameter of the equation may differ by +1/6 or -1/6 from an integer; this possibility was missed. The omission affects a recent result on the monodromy of the Weierstrass form of the Lamé equation. [See R. C. Churchill, "Two-generator subgroups of SL(2,C) and the hypergeometric, Riemann, and Lamé equations", J. Symbolic Computation 28 (1999), 521-545.] The Weierstrass form, which is a differential equation on an elliptic curve, may have, after all, an octahedral projective monodromy group.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Characterizing higher-dimensional Hölder domains via spherical geometric functions
Emily Casey, Max Engelstein, Tatiana Toro
The second type of power mean bounds for the hypergeometric mean
Zhen-Hang Yang, Jing-Feng Tian
Spread-out Furstenberg sets II: general configurations and fractal restricted projections
Alex Cohen, Pablo Shmerkin, Hong Wang et al.
Spread-out Furstenberg sets I: the sticky case
Tuomas Orponen, Pablo Shmerkin
Hsiang cubics as spherical Chebyshev polynomials: equioscillation and idempotent quadrature
Vladimir G. Tkachev
Sharp power-weight estimates for the fractional spherical maximal operator
Riju Basak, Surjeet Singh Choudhary, Chun-Yen Shen et al.