Canonical projections of irregular algebraic surfaces

Abstract

A good canonical projection of a surface S of general type is a morphism to the 3-dimensional projective space P3 given by 4 sections of the canonical line bundle. To such a projection one associates the direct image sheaf F of the structure sheaf of S, which is shown to admit a certain length 1 symmetrical locally free resolution. The structure theorem gives necessary and sufficient conditions for such a length 1 locally free symmetrical resolution of a sheaf F on P3 in order that Spec (mathcal F) yield a canonically projected surface of general type. The result was found in 1983 by the first author in the regular case, and the main ingredient here for the irregular (= non Cohen-Macaulay) case is to replace the use of Hilbert resolutions with the use of Beilinson's monads. Most of the paper is devoted then to the analysis of irregular canonical surfaces with pg=4 and low degree (the analysis in the regular case had been initiated by F. Enriques). For q=1 we classify completely the (irreducible) moduli space for the minimal value K2=12. We also study other moduli spaces, q=2, K2=18, and q=3, K2=12. The last family is provided by the divisors in a (1,1,2) polarization on some Abelian 3-fold. A remarkable subfamily is given by the pull backs, under a 2-isogeny, of the theta divisor of a p.p.Abelian 3-fold: for those surfaces the canonical map is a double cover of a canonical surface (i.e., such that its canonical map is birational). The canonical image is a sextic surface with a plane cubic as double curve, and moreover with an even set of 32 nodes as remaining singular locus. Our method allows to write the equations of these transcendental objects, but not yet to construct new ones by computer algebra.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…