Dimension of Families of Determinantal Schemes

Abstract

A scheme X⊂ n+c of codimension c is called standard determinantal if its homogeneous saturated ideal can be generated by the maximal minors of a homogeneous t × (t+c-1) matrix and X is said to be good determinantal if it is standard determinantal and a generic complete intersection. Given integers a0,a1,...,at+c-2 and b1,...,bt we denote by W(b;a)⊂ p(n+c) (resp. Ws(b;a)) the locus of good (resp. standard) determinantal schemes X⊂ n+c of codimension c defined by the maximal minors of a t× (t+c-1) matrix (fij)i=1,...,tj=0,...,t+c-2 where fij∈ k[x0,x1,...,xn+c] is a homogeneous polynomial of degree aj-bi. In this paper we address the following three fundamental problems : To determine (1) the dimension of W(b;a) (resp. Ws(b;a)) in terms of aj and bi, (2) whether the closure of W(b;a) is an irreducible component of p(n+c), and (3) when p(n+c) is generically smooth along W(b;a). Concerning question (1) we give an upper bound for the dimension of W(b;a) (resp. Ws(b;a)) which works for all integers a0,a1,...,at+c-2 and b1,...,bt, and we conjecture that this bound is sharp. The conjecture is proved for 2 c 5, and for c 6 under some restriction on a0,a1,...,at+c-2 and b1,...,bt. For questions (2) and (3) we have an affirmative answer for 2 c 4 and n 2, and for c 5 under certain numerical assumptions.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…