Counting sets with small sumset, and the clique number of random Cayley graphs
Ben Green
Abstract
Given a set A in Z/NZ we may form a Cayley sum graph GA on vertex set Z/NZ by joining i to j if and only if i + j is in A. We investigate the extent to which performing this construction with a random set A simulates the generation of a random graph, proving that the clique number of GA is a.s. O(log N). This shows that Cayley sum graphs can furnish good examples of Ramsey graphs. To prove this result we must study the specific structure of set addition on Z/NZ. Indeed, we also show that the clique number of a random Cayley sum graph on (Z/2Z)n, 2n = N, is almost surely not O(log N). Despite the graph-theoretical title, this is a paper in number theory. Our main results are essentially estimates for the number of sets A in 1,...,N with |A| = k and |A + A| = m, for various values of k and m.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Off-Diagonal Induced Ramsey Numbers
Bruno Andrades, Marcelo Campos, Rafael Filipe et al.
Largest Sperner families with bounded VC-dimension
Gennian Ge, Hanyu Wang, Zixiang Xu et al.
Proof of two conjectures on the log-concavity of partition ranks and cranks
Jianxi Mao, Wenle Shi, Bao-Xuan Zhu
The Exact Number of Pentagons in Book-Free Graphs
Wentao Hu
A family of symmetric counterexamples to the bent sum decomposition conjecture
Máté Róbert Kepes, Anita Kercsó-Molnár, Viczián András
Counting graphs admitting a strictly matched involution
Stephan Dominique Andres, Igor Režan