The topology of out(Fn)
Abstract
We will survey the work on the topology of Out(Fn) in the last 20 years or so. Much of the development is driven by the tantalizing analogy with mapping class groups. Unfortunately, Out(Fn) is more complicated and less well-behaved. Culler and Vogtmann constructed Outer Space Xn, the analog of Teichm\"uller space, a contractible complex on which Out(Fn) acts with finite stabilizers. Paths in Xn can be generated using ``foldings'' of graphs, an operation introduced by Stallings to give alternative solutions for many algorithmic questions about free groups. The most conceptual proof of the contractibility of Xn involves folding. There is a normal form of an automorphism, analogous to Thurston's normal form for surface homeomorphisms. This normal form, called a ``(relative) train track map'', consists of a cellular map on a graph and has good properties with respect to iteration. One may think of building an automorphism in stages, adding to the previous stages a building block that either grows exponentially or polynomially. A complicating feature is that these blocks are not ``disjoint'' as in Thurston's theory, but interact as upper stages can map over the lower stages. Applications include the study of growth rates (a surprising feature of free group automorphisms is that the growth rate of f is generally different from the growth rate of f-1), of the fixed subgroup of a given automorphism, and the proof of the Tits alternative for Out(Fn).
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.