A Family of Well-Covered Graphs with Unimodal Independence Polynomials

Abstract

If for any k the k-th coefficient of a polynomial I(G;x) is equal to the number of stable sets of cardinality k in graph G, then it is called the independence polynomial of G (Gutman and Harary, 1983). J. I. Brown, K. Dilcher and R. J. Nowakowski (2000) conjectured that the independence polynomial of a well-covered graph G (i.e., a graph whose all maximal independent sets are of the same size) is unimodal, that is, there exists an index k such that the part of the sequence of coefficients from the first to k-th is non-decreasing while the other part of coefficients is non-increasing. T. S. Michael and N. Traves (2002) provided examples of well-covered graphs whose independence polynomials are not unimodal. A. Finbow, B. Hartnell and R. J. Nowakowski (1993) proved that under certain conditions, any well-covered graph equals G* for some G, where G* is the graph obtained from G by appending a single pendant edge to each vertex of G. Y. Alavi, P. J. Malde, A. J. Schwenk and P. Erd\"os (1987) asked whether for trees the independence polynomial is unimodal. V. E. Levit and E. Mandrescu (2002) validated the unimodality of the independence polynomials of some well-covered trees (e.g., Pn*,K1,n*, where Pn is the path on n vertices and K1,n is the n-star graph). In this paper we show that for any graph G with the stability number alpha(G) < 5, the independence polynomial of G* is unimodal.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…