Remarks on a paper by Juhász and Kunen
Sakae Fuchino, Stefan Geschke
Abstract
We give an equivalent, but simpler formulation of the axiom SEP introduced by Juhasz and Kunen. Our formulation shows that many of the consequences of the weak Freese-Nation Property of P(ω) already follow from SEP. We show that it is consistent that SEP holds while P(ω) fails to have the (1,0)-ideal property, which has been introduced by Hart and Dow . This answers a question addressed independently by Fuchino and by Kunen. We also consider some natural variants of SEP and show that certain changes in the definition of SEP do not lead to a different principle. This answers a question addressed by Blass.
Create a lesson
Related papers
On separable pairs of fields and beautiful pairs of separably closed valued fields
Zhengqing He, Martin Hils
Fragments of SRP, the nonstationary ideal, and diagonal reflection
Gunter Fuchs, Hiroshi Sakai
Functional Projection and Complexity Reduction
Vera Fischer, Yurii Khomskii, Yipu Li et al.
On the foundations of logic and probability, II. Modal probability spaces
Loic Cosyns
Linear Logic via algebra I: Girard algebras
Paolo Agliano, Mitar Nedeljkovic
Proper varieties of distributive l-pregroups are periodic
Nikolaos Galatos, Simon Santschi