Very well-covered graphs and the unimodality conjecture

Abstract

If for any k the k-th coefficient of a polynomial I(G;x) is equal to the number of stable sets of cardinality k in the graph G, then it is called the independence polynomial of G (Gutman and Harary, 1983). Let a be the size of a maximum stable set. Alavi, Malde, Schwenk and Erdos (1987)conjectured that I(T,x) is unimodal for any tree T, while, in general, they proved that for any permutation p of 1,2,...,a there is a graph such that sp(1)<sp(2)<...<sp(a). Brown, Dilcher and Nowakowski (2000) conjectured that I(G;x) is unimodal for any well-covered graph. Michael and Traves (2002) provided examples of well-covered graphs with non-unimodal independence polynomials. They proposed the "roller-coaster" conjecture: for a well-covered graph, the subsequence (sa/2,sa/2+1,...,sa) is unconstrained in the sense of Alavi et al. The conjecture of Brown et al. is still open for very well-covered graphs. In this paper we prove that s(2a-1)/3>=...>=sa-1>=sa are valid for any (a) bipartite graph G; (b) quasi-regularizable graph G on 2a vertices. In particular, we infer that this is true for (a) trees, thus doing a step in an attempt to prove Alavi et al.' conjecture; (b) very well-covered graphs. Consequently, for this case, the unconstrained subsequence appearing in the roller-coaster conjecture can be shorten to (sa/2,sa/2+1,...,s(2a-1)/3). We also show that the independence polynomial of a very well-covered graph G is unimodal for a<10, and is log-concave whenever a<6.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…