Proofs Without Syntax
Dominic Hughes
Abstract
"[M]athematicians care no more for logic than logicians for mathematics." Augustus de Morgan, 1868. Proofs are traditionally syntactic, inductively generated objects. This paper presents an abstract mathematical formulation of propositional calculus (propositional logic) in which proofs are combinatorial (graph-theoretic), rather than syntactic. It defines a *combinatorial proof* of a proposition P as a graph homomorphism h : C -> G(P), where G(P) is a graph associated with P and C is a coloured graph. The main theorem is soundness and completeness: P is true iff there exists a combinatorial proof h : C -> G(P).
Create a lesson
Related papers
The universal measure of nonstochastic objects
Vladimir Vovk
Hyperarithmetic directions can all be exceptional for Marstrand's projection theorem
Noam Greenberg, Daniel Turetsky
Open Problems in Mathematical Logic
George Barmpalias, Su Gao, Jialiang He et al.
An easy proof that there may be no P-points
David Chodounský, Osvaldo Guzmán, Jonathan Verner
Comments on Choiceless Chain Conditions
Constance Bromham, Asaf Karagila
Localic Esakia Duality via Conic Frames
Nesta van der Schaaf