Configurations in abelian categories. III. Stability conditions and identities
Abstract
This is the third in a series math.AG/0312190, math.AG/0503029, math.AG/0410268 on configurations in an abelian category A. Given a finite partially ordered set (I,<), an (I,<)-configuration (σ,,π) is a finite collection of objects σ(J) and morphisms (J,K) or π(J,K) : σ(J) --> σ(K) in A satisfying some axioms, where J,K are subsets of I. Configurations describe how an object X in A decomposes into subobjects. The first paper math.AG/0312190 defined configurations and studied moduli spaces ObjA, M(I,<)A of objects and (I,<)-configurations in A, using the theory of Artin stacks. The second math.AG/0503029 considered algebras of constructible functions and "stack functions" on ObjA, using the theories developed in math.AG/0403305, math.AG/0509722. This paper introduces (weak) stability conditions (t,T,<) on A. We show the moduli spaces Objssa(t),Objsta(t) of t-(semi)stable objects in class a in K(A) are constructible sets in the stack ObjA, and some configuration moduli spaces Mss,...,Mstb(I,<,k,t)A are constructible in M(I,<)A. So their characteristic functions dssa(t),... and dss(I,<,k,t),... are constructible functions on ObjA and M(I,<)A. We prove many identities relating pushforwards of these functions under 1-morphisms between moduli stacks. These encode facts about, for example, the Euler characteristic of the family of ways of decomposing a t-semistable object into t-stable factors, and constitute a kind of "universal algebra of t-(semi)stability". Using these we define interesting (Lie) algebras of constructible functions Hpat,Htot and Lpat,Ltot on ObjA. All this is generalized to "stack functions".
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.