Elliptic divisibility sequences and undecidable problems about rational points
Abstract
Julia Robinson has given a first-order definition of the rational integers Z in the rational numbers Q by a formula (∀ ∃ ∀ ∃)(F=0) where the ∀-quantifiers run over a total of 8 variables, and where F is a polynomial. This implies that the 5-theory of Q is undecidable. We prove that a conjecture about elliptic curves provides an interpretation of Z in Q with quantifier complexity ∀ ∃, involving only one universally quantified variable. This improves the complexity of defining Z in Q in two ways, and implies that the 3-theory, and even the 2-theory, of Q is undecidable (recall that Hilbert's Tenth Problem for Q is the question whether the 1-theory of Q is undecidable). In short, granting the conjecture, there is a one-parameter family of hypersurfaces over Q for which one cannot decide whether or not they all have a rational point. The conjecture is related to properties of elliptic divisibility sequences on an elliptic curve and its image under rational 2-descent, namely existence of primitive divisors in suitable residue classes, and we discuss how to prove weaker-in-density versions of the conjecture and present some heuristics.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.