No-counterexample interpretation et spécification des théorèmes de l'arithmétique
Denis Bonnay
Abstract
This paper presents two different ways of extracting the computational content of formal proofs in arithmetic. The first one corresponds to Kreisel's No-counterexample Interpretation. based on Ackermann consistency proof. We show the link with recent work by Krivine on classical realizability. Finally, we discuss the various degrees of modularity of both approaches.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Logarithmic--exponential preparation in sharply o-minimal structures
Gal Binyamini, Oded Carmon, Dmitry Novikov
Stoic Logic and Natural Term Logic
Clarence Lewis Protin
From raw Solvability Complexity Index proofs to Weihrauch degrees
Christopher Sorg
Existence of bases implies the axiom of choice, a foundation-free proof
Gabriel Fernandes, Renan Maneli Mezabarba, Vinicius de Oliveira Rodrigues
Every countable meet-continuous lattice is Scott sober
Xiaoquan Xu, Wei Ji
A minimal type of Morley rank ω in a partial differential field
Piotr Kowalski