Configurations in abelian categories. II. Ringel-Hall algebras

Abstract

This is the second in a series math.AG/0312190, math.AG/0410267, math.AG/0410268 on configurations in an abelian category A. Given a finite partially ordered set (I,<), an (I,<)-configuration (σ,,π) is a finite collection of objects σ(J) and morphisms (J,K) or π(J,K) : σ(J) --> σ(K) in A satisfying some axioms, where J,K are subsets of I. Configurations describe how an object X in A decomposes into subobjects. The first paper math.AG/0312190 defined configurations and studied moduli spaces of (I,<)-configurations in A, using the theory of Artin stacks. It proved well-behaved moduli stacks ObjA, M(I,<)A of objects and configurations in A exist when A is the abelian category coh(P) of coherent sheaves on a projective K-scheme P, or mod-KQ of representations of a quiver Q. Write CF(ObjA) for the vector space of constructible functions on ObjA. Motivated by Ringel-Hall algebras, we define an associative multiplication * on CF(ObjA) using pushforwords and pullbacks along 1-morphisms between the M(I,<)A, making CF(ObjA) into an algebra. We also study representations of CF(ObjA), the Lie subalgebra CFind(ObjA) of functions supported on indecomposables, and other algebraic structures on CF(ObjA). Then we generalize these ideas to stack functions SF(ObjA), a universal generalization of constructible functions on stacks introduced in math.AG/0509722, containing more information. Under extra conditions on A we can define (Lie) algebra morphisms from SF(ObjA) to some explicit (Lie) algebras, which will be important in the sequels on invariants counting t-(semi)stable objects in A.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…