PIIPTI, or the Principle of Increasing Irrelevance of Preference Type Information
Elemer E Rosinger
Abstract
It is shown that in the case of a single decision maker who optimizes several possibly conflicting objectives, the amount of information available in preference relations among pairs of possible decisions, when compared with all other possible information, is tending to zero exponentially with the number of those different objectives. Consequently, in the case of a larger number of conflicting objectives, the only way to obtain a satisfactory amount of information is by the use of non-preference type relations among possible decisions.
Create a lesson
Related papers
A Network Simplex Framework For Discrete Unbalanced Optimal Transport
Gaetano Agazzotti, Antonin Chambolle, Clément W. Royer
Warm-IP: A Path-Following ADMM Warm Start for Interior-Point Quadratic Programming
Babak Aslani, Mojtaba Tefagh, Gourav Jhanwar et al.
Adaptive Variance Reduction without Knowing Oracle Smoothness
Wei Jiang, Yibo Wang, Zechao Li
Optimal Algorithms for Nonsmooth Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization with Constraints
Gon Buzaglo, Guy Kornowski
Geometry-Aware Multi-Objective Optimization: Norm-Constrained Oracles with Entropic Weight Updates
El Mahdi Chayti, Alireza Mirrokni, Martin Jaggi
Estimation, Sensitivity Analysis, and Optimization of Distortion Risk Measures via Simulation
Hao Cao, Jian-Qiang Hu, Jiaqiao Hu