A human proof for a generalization of Shalosh B. Ekhad's 10n Lattice Paths Theorem
Nicholas A. Loehr, Bruce E. Sagan, Gregory S. Warrington
Abstract
Consider lattice paths in Z2 taking unit steps north (N) and east (E). Fix positive integers r,s and put an equivalence relation on points of Z2 by letting v,w be equivalent if v - w = m (r,s) for some m in Z. Call a lattice path valid if whenever it enters a point v with an E-step, then any further points of the path in the class of v are also entered with an E-step. Loehr and Warrington conjectured that the number of valid paths from (0,0) to (nr,ns) is (r+s choose r)n. We prove this conjecture when s = 2.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Combinatorics of hyperplane arrangements and Witten zeta function at the origin
Kam Cheong Au, Kazuhiro Onodera
Proof of the Pach-Tardos conjecture
Lior Gishboliner, Xiangyu Li
Longest cycles intersect linearly in highly connected graphs
Jie Ma, Bo Ning, Ziyuan Zhao
Cutting a convex body into fat parts and approximating Euclidean distance by graph distances
János Pach, Gábor Tardos
A counterexample to the quantum Hedetniemi conjecture
Julius A. Zeiss
Schrijver-Delsarte rigidity in association schemes and undecidability of quantum graph homomorphism
Lorenzo Ciardo, Iris Hebbeker, Gideo Joubert et al.