The K-theory of abelian versus nonabelian symplectic quotients

Abstract

We compare the K-theories of symplectic quotients with respect to a compact connected Lie group and with respect to its maximal torus, and in particular we give a method for computing the former in terms of the latter. More specifically, let G be a compact connected Lie group with no torsion in its fundamental group, let T be a maximal torus of G, and let M be a compact Hamiltonian G-space. Let M//G and M//T denote the symplectic quotients of M by G and by T, respectively. Using Hodgkin's Kunneth spectral sequence for equivariant K-theory, we express the K-theory of M//G in terms of the elements in the K-theory of M//T which are invariant under the action of the Weyl group, in addition to the Euler class e of a natural Spinc vector bundle over M//T. This Euler class e is induced by the denominator in the Weyl character formula, viewed as a virtual representation of T; this is relevant for our proof. Our results are K-theoretic analogues of similar (unpublished) results by Martin for rational cohomology. However, our results and approach differ from his in three significant ways. First, Martin's method involves integral formulae, but the corresponding index formulae in K-theory are too coarse a tool, as they cannot detect torsion. Instead, we carefully analyze related K-theoretic pushforward maps. Second, Martin's method involves dividing by the order of the Weyl group, which is not possible in (integral) K-theory. We render this unnecessary by examining Weyl anti-invariant elements, proving a K-theoretic version of a lemma due to Brion. Finally, Martin's results are expressed in terms of the annihilator ideal of e2, the square of the Euler class mentioned above. We are able to "remove the square", working instead with the annihilator ideal of e.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…